On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:50:38 +0300 (MSK), you wrote: Hi,
> Dura lex, sed lex. Law applied notwitstanding, if there is (explicit) >lost of money/reputation. Issue is only will someone raise sue or not. In western world like US, maybe someone will think "carry out the law" is most important, but for Chinese, money is most important, so the local businessman will consider money as major reason. > There is not important - will you spread "breaked" data/materials or >analysis of "breaked" data. With DMCA, any virus maker _may_ sue antiviruses >producer, because they decrypt their production to make vacsine. In our case, we're not decrypting the ROM data, just trace the how the code run and make sure our own program won't conflict with it, will this break the US law? I'm no law expert so I really not sure. Rgds, Johnson. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
