Is there a 1.1? I am under the impression that although 1.0 may be obsolete, it's all there is.
JGH On 2/23/10, dos386 <dos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Just wanted to ask if this was the right place to report or discuss > > Welcome :-) > >> comments, suggestions, bug reports &c in FreeDOS 1.0? I've just > > The 1.0 distro is obsolete. > > many things got fixed: HIMEM/EMM, DEVLOAD, ... > > some partially: kernel (2038), EDIT (yeah), FDISK (patch pending), > DEFRAG/SCANDISK, ... > > some not: FreeCOM, DELTREE, ... > > some are fine anyway: ATTRIB, ... > > some will never (?) be added like UI21DEB, UZ un'ZIP'pper (needs 80386), ... > > > > -- > ~~~ wow ~~~ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
