> what about the exFAT filesystem? Already on my CRAP LIST ;-)
> - it is 64-bit (63-bit?) in any case, the filesystem handles huge amounts of > data. maybe true > - it is supported by windows vista SP1 and 7 (but not by xp prior to SP2) maybe true > - it doesn't have the shortsighted 32GB limitation imposed by ill-written > microsoft So your preferred solution is to stick to this "ill-written" company ??? > FAT32 can actually handle a LOT more, but people aren't coding for that > because of cross-platform compatibility issues I think. People are sticking to Windaube and call it "cross-platform compatibility" ;-) > - Support for UTC timestamps subminor > - support for TFAT (transactional filesystem standard) yeah > a license from microsoft is required I'm donating exactly 0.00000000000000000 AKA ZERO $$$ for it ;-) > to implement because it has not been released yet and possibly never will > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT Mikripedia, the free advertising space for Macro$oft :-( > I am being forced now to move my DJGPP compilers to the DOS Good, someone should port DGJPP (or MinGW or GCC or whatever) back to DOS ;-) > world because newer 64-bit OS computers will not execute DJGPP. NOT true. -- ~~~ wow ~~~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
