On Jan 1, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Jim Hall wrote: > It seems clear a consensus is appearing, but I'll give folks another few > days to chime in. That will give me time to continue on website cleanup > things, anyway. :-)
I think primarily, your summary hit the nail on the head, with the caveat that if a 32-bit dos could be built that still maintained the backward compatibility for those programs that needed it, it would *not* be a bad thing, in fact, it'd be embraced wholeheartedly. Of course, the chances of that are slim, but if it could be pulled off, freedos would do something no other dos has ever managed, and that would sure be a boon. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
