No, I understand that. I mean nothing would prevent a user from manually utilizing it in the future if they deem it necessary.
On 9/7/2015 11:33 PM, Louis Santillan wrote: > Sadly, it would mean that specific version of mTCP could not be included in > FD. > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Mercury Thirteen > <mercury0x0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 9/7/2015 6:37 PM, Michael Brutman wrote: >> >> ... >> I think that whether it is open source or not it is still a great solution >> for DOS networking. If the lack of source code prevents you from using mTCP >> I regret that and I encourage you to question your assumption that without >> source code it is not "clean" or "good" enough for you. >> ... >> >> >> Well, Richard Stallman would throw a FIT. >> >> However... those of us not quite so zealous see nothing wrong with it. >> Source code is nice, but the lack thereof doesn't spell the end of the >> world. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Freedos-devel mailing list >> Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-devel mailing list > Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
