Hi again, On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Jim Hall <jh...@freedos.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Eric Auer <e.a...@jpberlin.de> wrote: >> >> > Regarding LTOOLS quality: This thing is ancient and of course it supports >> > only ext2, not ext3 or ext4.
Has anyone actually tested it recently? I haven't, but IIRC it never worked right anyways, at least not on this machine. I'm only blindly guessing, but perhaps the compiler wasn't up to snuff regarding 64-bit numbers for larger hard drives? https://web.archive.org/web/20071018170111/http://www.it.fht-esslingen.de/~zimmerma/software/ltools.html > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Rugxulo <rugx...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ext2 might be harder to support, but at least it wouldn't go near the >> stupid proprietary hell-fire. > > I would love to see ext2/3/4 support in FreeDOS. This would be a great idea. I found a 2009-ish port of ext2tools to DJGPP, but it may? be incomplete (has a few nits compiling, doesn't actually work, ugh). "e2part 128" just lists all my partitions as "Unknown", so of course "e2ls -l /" doesn't seem to work either (no matter how many env. var. settings I fiddle with). https://github.com/mmeeks/ext2tools If anyone rebuilds or tests this, I would appreciate hearing about it (even if it's clearly over my head). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
