Hi!
30-Май-2004 09:24 Arkady V.Belousov wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>> No, all right: r_catfun is a xreg.x and r_cat is a xreg.h. Mistake is
>>> in my comment: I was should say "difference is that r_cat comes _after_
>>> r_fun to make consistent with CX".
BO>> No, it can't be. See Table 02597 in RBIL at int2f/ax=0802,
BO>> ---command codes 13h,19h---
BO>> which is what the patch implemented.
AVB> Ok. When I receive latest sources, I review them.
...but my change consistent with previous source. For example: was
"if ((rp->r_count >> 8) == 0x48)", now "if (rp->r_cat == 0x48)". Ie. _was_
category value _after_ function value.
PS: "r_cat" and "r_fun" at first look was associated for me with "kitten"
and "funny". :)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id│66&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
