For example, I was send here many small patches for dsk.c. Where wasthere was no one (willing) to commit your changes. No discussion possible until the changes are located into the sourcecode.
your reaction? Void. :( Some time ago diff for, say, config.c was small, but
changes are accumulated over time, whereas you was not interested in this
process earlier. Now you blame me in this?
Luckily Lucho now provides your sources, which should make things easier.
people don't have time to daily review your patches. Send them once a month, or put all patches also in a zip-archive for download.
3 big DIFFs is better than 60 daily small patches (like your disk.c part 1 to 6 or so).
hopefully now everyone quits complaining.
Arkady, you are welcome to send a small set of patches once a week or so, and hopefully then people will review.
Daily is too much.
It's just like Eric, he also asks me almost daily to do things (experiments), and I don't always have time.
Then I tend to forget things, instead of "oh, I still need to do that".
daily is a bit too much, I hope you can agree on that.
Not to limit you in your work, but it's like an ongoing avalanche of small patches..hard to keep up with.
good luck, and I'll compile. I assume all your changes are from now on against the sources Lucho posted on his site?
Bernd
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
