Hi! 21-Июл-2004 20:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Eric Auer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> For drives beyond lastdrive, get_cds result protects from crashes, >> but in between, access to unformatted disks returns nonsense for >> int 21.36 and even crashes while trying to do critical error dialog te> really ? te> please provide exact code sequence where it DOES return nonsense - and te> I'll fix it. (we are talking about ke2035 !!) Bernd and Eric many times report, that WHICHFAT utility behaves wrongly under FreeDOS. If you blindly ommit those reports, then this not close the fact, that this happens. >> LBA_Get_Drive_Parameters should NOT disable LBA access if heads or >> sectors are > 64k te> As I wrote this: WHEN AND WHERE?! te> if sectors or heads are > 64K the LBA BIOS is probably buggy. te> and IMO it's better to refuse to work with a buggy BIOS then to te> try to trash a users disk. Hm. May be. >> or if totalSectHigh is nonzero. te> this will be relevant when disk (arrays) are larger then te> 2 TB (not that far away) te> but then we good old partitioning scheme stops to make sense, te> and it's better not to touch these disks at all. But they is touched (though, through CHS). te> there could be some (easy) workarounds for that (my estimate less te> then a few hundred resident byte) + understanding dynamic disk te> partitioning (non resident code). te> until that is done it's a better idea not to touch these disks. [...] >> but should be mentioned in kernel docs (<-> DEVICEHIGH/LOADHIGH). te> which kernel docs ? config.txt? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idG21&alloc_id040&op=click _______________________________________________ Freedos-kernel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel