Hi!

22-Июл-2004 21:24 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Eric Auer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>>> please provide exact code sequence where it DOES return nonsense - and
>>> I'll fix it. (we are talking about ke2035 !!)
>> That translates to: Provide a fix and you will have provided a fix. Helpful.
te> I intended to say (as above, but didn't exactly say it):
te>    provide some sort of
te>      mov ax,XXX
te>      mov dx,YYY
te>      int 21h
   -->> misbehaviour  (wrong return value, crash or just reboot)
te>    and the cavalry is set into march

     Eric, provide precise scenario for tom. For example:

- "I have unformatted partition, unimportant which size";
- "I run WHICHFAT";
- "I get bla-bla-bla behavior instead bla-bla-bla behavior, as in MS-DOS";
- "WHICHFAT calls bla-bla-bla functions; on output expected bla-bla-bla, but
  received bla-bla-bla".

>>>     and it's better not to touch these disks at all.
>> I vote for: Then you better only use the first 2 TB.
te> I vote for: wait till 2TB disks arrive. see. possibly fix bugs.
te> THEN remove this.

     _Sometime_, better to prevent such "bugfixing", especially because CHS
access is only one possible way, how to handle strange geometry, and it is
not the best (even as compromise between LBA and "no disk").

>>> > Track wrap protection and DMA wrap
>>> >   protection should be turned off (maybe add a SYS CONFIG variable!)
>>> >   for harddisks.
te> I measured - it's irrelevant.

     "Irrelevant" = "doesn't changes speed"?




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idG21&alloc_id040&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel

Reply via email to