Hi!
15-Авг-2004 21:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bart Oldeman) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BO> BC isn't a target for freedos optimizations; there's one and only one
BO> target to optimize for : WATCOM.
BO> so BC specific optimization is a waste of time (ours and yours)
BO> This just being tom's opinion but I still agree --
I agree too, but _small_ optimizations, like discussed joined write
into lr.BX, _may_ be applied, because they (may) help for other compilers
too.
BO> I even agree more than
BO> I did a couple months ago, that's why I rejected my own idea of using
BO> "_seg *" pointers. I played for a while again with Turbo C++ back then but
BO> in the end decided that the difference was just too big.
After my playing with _seg (you may see its usage in "unstable" branch
through MK_SEG_PTR()) I see the noticeable code reduction for Borland.
Though, Borland contains bug also there, it related to conversion
literal values to far pointers. :(
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
Freedos-kernel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-kernel
