Hi,
Jim Hall escribió:
Jim Hall wrote:
Not sure what to do about the LSMs for either SHSUCDX or XDMA...
Johnson Lam wrote:
Attached 2 LSM, not 100% sure about the format ...
Format looks good. I've edited the shsucdx LSM a little bit .. just to
make sure the distinction is clear when you look at the LSM summary. Let
me know if that's not a good change for me to make.
Both are now in the Software List:
http://freedos.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/freedos-lsm.cgi?q=f&a=base/shsucdx-jack.lsm
http://freedos.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/freedos-lsm.cgi?q=f&a=util/xdma.lsm
I think XDMA belongs in "Util" since it doesn't try to duplicate
functionality in MS-DOS. We made an exception with UDMA and UDMA2,
though .. and I guess I'm open to discussion about moving XDMA into
"Base" as well.
I think the same argument applies, except that perhaps it is better to
decide for one as MAIN (in Base) being the others "variations" (in UTIL).
Aitor
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
