On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 01:30:34 -0500, you wrote: Dear Sir,
Sorry for my limited ability of English language, I hope I didn't interpreted your meaning in a wrong way. ><that should never have been publicly reposted> Jack did a TECHNICAL reply to Eric's wrong interpretation of QHIMEM, what's wrong? We didn't SELL QHIMEM nor ask the other to quit FD-HIMEM and FD-EMM386, for what reason we need to keep it private? I don't understand why you overreacted. >What I suggest you reflect upon, Mr. Lam, are your personal reasons for >posting this entire private e-mail to the public list. It serves little >purpose here other than to incite more anger and hurtful retaliatory I want to introduce a good alternative memory manager to the others, helping the users to solve problems, WHO start complaining this and that, and speak of "suspicious", "advocate"? I'm trying to be polite, tolerate and avoid conflicts, but someone just want these. I'm really tired of the non-constructive email of some "human emotional" discussions without solid technical reasons. I didn't hate Eric, sometimes he did say something wrong, then I think we need to "correct" this, towards the specific matter, not toward the person, purely subjective. >remarks. The action follows on the heels of your sidetracking a technical >support request into an exercise in unrelated memory manager advocacy. In >short, your recent behavior demonstrates a serious failure of judgement in >how to positively contribute to an open-source project. This is your point of view, not the whole Open-Source community, everyone contribute their parts, not attacking the others because of the emotional reason such as "I don't like it". >Apparently you feel uniquely justified in your efforts to topple stable and >well-tested drivers in favor of the output of a single individual you hold >in unimpeachable regard. Directly or by proxy, you denigrate the sum of >thousands of hours of testing, development, and support hours contributed >by hundreds of FreeDOS users and developers. Project team effort is all to Many users or contributors REALLY become CD-ROM (read-only) to avoided the "human social trouble" here, but I can't shut up simply because Eric or someone making wrong assumptions. We speak the truth base on technical reasons. >be swept away by the single unsung genius. For you, the presumed raw >talent of one person trumps all other aspects of development and the >talents contained therein. And finally, although the new driver is at >least three years too late to enter the official FreeDOS memory manager >race this close to the 1.0 release goal line, it seems it still must be >crowned the best mostly by virtue of -- as near as can tell -- abuse >towards the unenlightened. I see no conflict here, users will pick the best software of their own, because they're not quest for a GANG style, maybe I should say a "nationalism" like collections of programs, they just want something works best on their computers. >Who you like and what you think of their work is strictly your >business. The rest is not. Jack and I just want to make FreeDOS better, and "a few people" not appreciate his hard work, and turn against him. I really don't know what kind of world it is, I don't want to scare away other users here, if you don't mind, please return our discussion to technical issue. I didn't include Jack reply this time, because his reply really speak the whole truth, too exciting ... truth is always the hardest thing to be accepted. Rgds, Johnson Lam. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
