At 12:59 PM 3/31/2009, Michael Reichenbach wrote: >Ralf A. Quint schrieb: > >> Not the programmer of DOSLFN would be sued, also probable not the > >> hypothetical programmer for LFN in DOS-C. > >> > >> I think it's the distributor who would get sued and this is in this case > >> the responsible person for the website. (Fortunally also other people > >> are redistribution FreeDOS and/or DOSLFN but to sue freedos.org does not > >> mean that them get also automatically sued.) > >> > >> So programming LFN for DOS-C wouldn't make a difference. The risk to get > >> sued is already there and not bigger because the patent is already > >> violated so or so. > > > > Again, I think you are to "blauäugig" here. Two > > times wrong doesn't make things right.... > >I don't understand this sentence. What's 2 times wrong?
Sorry, looks like you are not aware of that saying, and I do not recall the equivalent German version. Basically, if you are doing something the wrong way, it doesn't become right just because you keep doing it... I think you are far too naive when it comes to the possible consequences of thinking the way you do... Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
