On 2/10/2015 5:34 PM, Rugxulo wrote: >> I perform Dosemu detection according to instruction and example in this >> old FreeDOS maillist thread: >> http://marc.info/?l=freedos-dev&m=88425176918117&w=2 > I know you sent similar e-mail about mixed environments in the past. > Normally you wouldn't want to split hairs unless forced. In other > words, pretending that all things are created equal is the best path > unless hit by some kind of bug or (lack of) feature. In particular, > there are too many environments (and tools and setups) to test. > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.os.msdos.djgpp/ZIAGTLppAJg/iCVeqAti0qYJ > >> (and curiously, in referenced thread deprecated method Int 0xE6 AH=0 >> still /after ~17 years/ is supported and seems be working well) > IIRC, only AX=0 [sic] worked for me. > > But again, DOSEMU isn't widely deployed, so lots of people don't use > it. It still works fairly well, just not popular. I'm not sure if that > will ever improve. I don't want to discourage you, but I'm not sure > what you want to get working there. Why not? If people would always think this way, nothing would get done. There's more to programming in (Free)DOS than recompiling bloated Linux programs...
Ralf --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
