On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:48:34 -0500 Rugxulo wrote:
>
>> No not at all, I have just uploaded the latest version, including an update
>> to some documentation/presentations in PDF format, it is at:
>
>PDF is a bit bloated and DOS-unfriendly, but I understand your need to
>use something modern and accessible (or whatever). 

Something that is rather usable on most of the supported platforms.
DOS is a bit of the exception here. I used to maintain an HTML version 
of the same presentations too, but dropped that for space/time reasons.

The sources are in OpenOffice though, so I could have a look at
what th export alternatives are, to bundle into the distribution ZIP ...

>already included inside TXWINLIB.ZIP, right?)

Right, and they are kept up-to-dte at the websit too of course ...

>First of all, typo, it says "110 Mb", which would have been quite
>startling! But in reality it only jumped from 7 to 10 Mb instead. (Big
>relief!) 

Oops, my bad.  Thanks for noticing, just fixed that ...

>I haven't looked closely at why the increase, but I assume
>precompiled libs. (No, I only see [Mach-O] .a files.)

Right, another 'oops', the intention wa to include all the libraries pre-built
so you could concentrate on building some application (not the library)
but I made a mistake with a 'build clean' at some point.

Fixed now, and re-uploaded a cleaned up/compledted version of the ZIP

Note:
>From the samples, only the 'TXT' test application has non-debug versions
of the executables for all the platforms, so you can see what it looks like
without having the build environment ready yet ...

>> >OW 1.9 runs natively in DOS. Or did you mean the makefiles need
>> >adjustments? (Long cmdlines for OW tools need an asterisk/star '*' !!)
>>
>> Never tested that, but should not be that hard to get working
>> when all the OpenWatcom stuff is available.
>>
>> It only uses WMAKE, the C-compiler and WLINK
>
>It should work fine, then. Moreso I was worried because I didn't see
>any precompiled libs. (Though your page says builds atop Windows, too,
>so that's fairly ubiquitous. Better than atop OS/2 only.)

Right, never tested on DOS (or Linux, which also has OpenWatcom binaries)
but should not be too hard to get working ...

>Actually, I think somewhere you include some binaries, which
>themselves are needed to rebuild some parts: TEE (OS/2 only), LXLITE
>(OS/2 only), and UPX (DOS, apparently old 1.25 with non-free NRV
>instead of libre UCL).

They are just for convenience, and not needed to build the library,
not very important for the sample either, so I just took them out
of the distrubution now (and references to them) without much
loss of function.

Anyone buillding an app can add EXE-compression later, when desired.
(which is less and less the case, with todays large hard-disks :)


>* 
>http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/devel/upx/upx-ucl-3.09.zip

Right, I think I am using 3.94 myself at the moment (for my DFSee application).

>I'm overthinking it, of course, so maybe it's not crucial that it's
>all rebuildable atop DOS proper. But for mirroring to iBiblio we try
>to keep things totally free/libre these days. 

Yes, that is one reason to take them out of this distribution, they are not 
really needed here ...


>(I see you linked to some downloads of Win32 and OS/2 compiles of Wget. 

Yes, that is on that same 'Free Downloads' page but NOT part of the TxWin 
distribution.
They can be used with my DFSee application to do version-updates from within 
the program itself.


>I'll take another closer look later and email Jim Hall again to try to iron 
>out some details.

Sure, just get the latest ZIP to have the cleaned up, and more complete 
distribution:
(and remove the old unpacked stuff first, since some files were removed :)

        https://www.dfsee.com/download/#txwin

>Thanks for your time in answering.

You're welcone

Regards, JvW



Jan van Wijk, author of DFSee; http://www.dfsee.com/dfsee/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to