Hi, (sorry for delay in testing) On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:17 AM C. Masloch <pus...@ulukai.org> wrote: > > On at 2019-10-05 18:49 -0500, Rugxulo wrote: > > "Unfortunately, nasm doesn't run over 8086/8088 processors,and I > > couldn't find a compatible assembler!" > > > > Strange. I was lightly playing with 8086tinyplus (on Windows) > > recently, and I noticed that the (in)famous 16-bit NASM build from > > 2005 of 0.98.39 didn't seem to run properly. (But that could be an > > emulator bug. It runs fine under QEMU. I know 8086tinyplus can't > > handle 186+ ENTER/LEAVE properly.) > > If the 16-bit NASM uses 186+ instructions, that's a bug (or possibly > wrong option?) on the part of the compiler.
The default 2005, 16-bit NASM build seems to work correctly under your (improved) fork of 8086tiny. So indeed, it must've been compiled for 186. > I also worked some on an 8086tiny fork of mine recently. There are > several bugfixes there, as well as implementing all 186 instructions, so > it might be worth testing. It's at https://github.com/ecm-pushbx/8086tiny/ I tested all of this under Linux (Xenial Puppy, 64-bit) jump drive. It seems you're missing "lmacros3.mac" (not found) for tinyxms, but I just ignored that for now: "make no_graphics -k -i" or whatever. (I just used a modified version of my old BARE_DOS floppy image.) Yeah, it seems to work better (than 8086tinyplus). I did keep around a 186, Oberon-M build of my Befunge-93 interpreter (bef186om.exe) just for identifying these kinds of bugs (mostly thinking of Fake86 here). Even that .EXE works here. So that's cool. _______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
