On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 5:44 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 03:58:00PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark <robdcl...@chromium.org>
> >
> > Slightly awkward to fish out the display_info when we aren't creating
> > own connector. But I don't see an obvious better way.
> >
> > v2: Remove error return with NO_CONNECTOR flag
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdcl...@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > index 6154bed0af5b..94c94cc8a4d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > @@ -667,11 +667,6 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge
> > *bridge,
> > .node = NULL,
> > };
> >
> > - if (flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR) {
> > - DRM_ERROR("Fix bridge driver to make connector optional!");
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > - }
> > -
> > pdata->aux.drm_dev = bridge->dev;
> > ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&pdata->aux);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > @@ -679,9 +674,11 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge
> > *bridge,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - ret = ti_sn_bridge_connector_init(pdata);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - goto err_conn_init;
> > + if (!(flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR)) {
> > + ret = ti_sn_bridge_connector_init(pdata);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto err_conn_init;
> > + }
> >
> > /*
> > * TODO: ideally finding host resource and dsi dev registration needs
> > @@ -743,7 +740,8 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge
> > *bridge,
> > err_dsi_attach:
> > mipi_dsi_device_unregister(dsi);
> > err_dsi_host:
> > - drm_connector_cleanup(&pdata->connector);
> > + if (!(flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR))
> > + drm_connector_cleanup(&pdata->connector);
>
> I wonder if we actually need this. The connector gets attached to the
> encoder, won't it be destroyed by the DRM core in the error path ?
This does not appear to be the case, we leak the connector if I remove
this (and add a hack to trigger the error path)
> > err_conn_init:
> > drm_dp_aux_unregister(&pdata->aux);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -792,9 +790,30 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct
> > ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> > regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_DSIA_CLK_FREQ_REG, val);
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Find the connector and fish out the bpc from display_info. It would
> > + * be nice if we could get this instead from drm_bridge_state, but that
> > + * doesn't yet appear to be the case.
>
> You already have a bus format in the bridge state, from which you can
> derive the bpp. Could you give it a try ?
Possibly the bridge should be converted to ->atomic_enable(), etc..
I'll leave that for another time
BR,
-R
> > + */
> > static unsigned int ti_sn_bridge_get_bpp(struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata)
> > {
> > - if (pdata->connector.display_info.bpc <= 6)
> > + struct drm_bridge *bridge = &pdata->bridge;
> > + struct drm_connector_list_iter conn_iter;
> > + struct drm_connector *connector;
> > + unsigned bpc = 0;
> > +
> > + drm_connector_list_iter_begin(bridge->dev, &conn_iter);
> > + drm_for_each_connector_iter(connector, &conn_iter) {
> > + if (drm_connector_has_possible_encoder(connector,
> > bridge->encoder)) {
> > + bpc = connector->display_info.bpc;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(bpc == 0);
> > +
> > + if (bpc <= 6)
> > return 18;
> > else
> > return 24;
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
