On 7/19/2022 11:19 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Akhil P Oommen (2022-07-18 21:07:05)
On 7/14/2022 11:10 AM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
On 7/12/2022 4:57 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,

On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 11:00 PM Akhil P Oommen
<quic_akhi...@quicinc.com> wrote:
Update gpu register array with gpucc memory region.

Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhi...@quicinc.com>
---

(no changes since v1)

   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 6 ++++--
   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index e66fc67..defdb25 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
@@ -2228,10 +2228,12 @@
                          compatible = "qcom,adreno-635.0",
"qcom,adreno";
                          reg = <0 0x03d00000 0 0x40000>,
                                <0 0x03d9e000 0 0x1000>,
-                             <0 0x03d61000 0 0x800>;
+                             <0 0x03d61000 0 0x800>,
+                             <0 0x03d90000 0 0x2000>;
                          reg-names = "kgsl_3d0_reg_memory",
                                      "cx_mem",
-                                   "cx_dbgc";
+                                   "cx_dbgc",
+                                   "gpucc";
This doesn't seem right. Shouldn't you be coordinating with the
existing gpucc instead of reaching into its registers?

IIUC, qcom gdsc driver doesn't ensure hardware is collapsed since they
are vote-able switches. Ideally, we should ensure that the hw has
collapsed for gpu recovery because there could be transient votes from
other subsystems like hypervisor using their vote register.

I am not sure how complex the plumbing to gpucc driver would be to allow
gpu driver to check hw status. OTOH, with this patch, gpu driver does a
read operation on a gpucc register which is in always-on domain. That
means we don't need to vote any resource to access this register.

Stephen/Rajendra/Taniya, any suggestion?
Why can't you assert a gpu reset signal with the reset APIs? This series
seems to jump through a bunch of hoops to get the gdsc and power domain
to "reset" when I don't know why any of that is necessary. Can't we
simply assert a reset to the hardware after recovery completes so the
device is back into a good known POR (power on reset) state?
That is because there is no register interface to reset GPU CX domain. The recommended sequence from HW design folks is to collapse both cx and gx gdsc to properly reset gpu/gmu.

-Akhil.

Reply via email to