On 16.01.2023 13:52, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 13:51, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dyb...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm
>> or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line,
>> which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node.
>
> I think we should have an explicit `if compatible then required:
> vdds-supply' clause. WDYT?
Well, the driver will still probe and function without it,
so I'm not sure if it's strictly required..
Konrad
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dyb...@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
>> index 9c9184f94c44..8e9031bbde73 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml
>> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ required:
>> - compatible
>> - reg
>> - reg-names
>> - - vdds-supply
>>
>> unevaluatedProperties: false
>>
>> --
>> 2.39.0
>>
>
>
