Dmitri Pal wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
On 07/30/2010 04:02 PM, Adam Young wrote:
On 07/22/2010 02:25 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Make sure that the host behind new host and service records is
actually a resolvable DNS A record. There is a --force flag if you
know what you are doing (or just feel like charging ahead anyway).
We use a lot of made-up names in the self-tests, had to add the
force flag to all of them.
rob
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
I can't get this patch to apply:
[ayo...@ayoung freeipa]$ git apply ~/Documents/IPA/freeipa-490-dns.patch
error: patch failed: ipalib/util.py:28
error: ipalib/util.py: patch does not apply
I've tried it both with and without patch 484
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
OK, disregard that, I was able to apply it on top of 484, build and
deploy.
I'd give it an ACK except that I can't figure out how to work around
service-add where the service is not yet resolvable. I understand
that this is not desired, but I'm fairly certain that not being able
to do this will mess up someone.
ipa service-add-host --force --hosts=web.example.com HTTP/web.example.com
Usage: ipa [global-options] service-add-host PRINCIPAL
ipa: error: no such option: --force
The --force should be an option. And if it does not resolve but internal
DNS is used then there should be an option to add it to the DNS.
So I guess the logic should be:
1) No options and the host resolves -> success
2) No options and the host does not resolve -> failure
3) --force is specified and the host resolves -> success (force is ignored)
4) --force is specified and the host does not resolve -> host is added as is
5) --dns is specified but we do not use internal DNS -> failure invalid
parameter
6) --dns is specified and we use internal DNS and the host resolves ->
host is added to the hosts and host is not added to dns since it is
already there
7) --dns is specified and we use internal DNS and the host does not
resolve -> host is added to the hosts and to dns
NACK for now.
No, I don't want to interweave DNS in this way right now. DNS is more
complex than automatically adding hosts would handle (an A record with
no PTR is worse than no A record IMHO).
This was merely an option I didn't explicitly test so it got past me.
I'll make sure --force works with service-add-host.
rob
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
