On 11/15/2012 05:33 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 11/15/2012 03:22 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 12:34 +0100, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>Fedora 16 introduced chrony as default client time&date synchronization
>>service:
>>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChronyDefaultNTP
>>Thus, there may be people already using chrony as their time and date
>>synchronization service before installing IPA.
>>
>>However, installing IPA server or client on such machine may lead to
>>unexpected behavior, as the IPA installer would configure ntpd and leave
>>the machine with both ntpd and chronyd enabled. However, since the OS
>>does not allow both chronyd and ntpd to be running concurrently and chronyd
>>has the precedence, ntpd would not be run on that system at all.
>>
>>Make sure, that user is warned when trying to install IPA on such
>>system and is given a possibility to either not to let IPA configure
>>ntpd at all or to let the installer stop and disable chronyd.
>>
>>https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2974
>
>This looks a bit backwards to me.
>
>The IPA server can only configure ntpd because it configures it to serve
>time to the clients. So on a server force_ntpd should be the default and
>the install should automatically shutdown crony.
I considered that option too, but it simply just did not seem very "polite" to
silently stop and disable chrony with some custom user time&date
synchronization configuration that user may rely on.

Telling user what's the problem and providing him with options what to do
seemed more user friendly to me...

+1

--
Petr^2 Spacek

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to