On 04/02/2013 12:12 PM, Martin Kosek wrote: > On 04/02/2013 11:57 AM, Ana Krivokapic wrote: >> On 03/11/2013 10:26 AM, Martin Kosek wrote: >>> On 03/06/2013 01:07 PM, Petr Spacek wrote: >>>> On 6.3.2013 09:32, Martin Kosek wrote: >>>>> + error=u'CNAME record is not allowed to coexist with any >>>>> other record'), >>>> Sorry for nitpicking again, but I would add note '(RFC 1034, section >>>> 3.6.2)'. >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>> Fixed. >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Freeipa-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel >> Patches 379 and 380 need rebasing. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Ana Krivokapic >> Associate Software Engineer >> FreeIPA team >> Red Hat Inc. >> > Rebased patches attached. > > Martin
The first patch (schema update) correctly changes both CNAME and DNAME attributes to single valued attributes. I tested the newly introduced validation rules, trying to add: * more than 1 cname record with the same name * cname + ptr * cname + dname * cname + any other record * more than 1 dname * dname + ns * dname + ns (root zone) As expected, validation fails for all the above cases except the last one (dname + ns in the root zone). ACK -- Regards, Ana Krivokapic Associate Software Engineer FreeIPA team Red Hat Inc. _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
