On 01/28/2014 09:35 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: > Petr Viktorin wrote: >> On 01/23/2014 02:17 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote: ... >> The URL endpoint /ipa/rest suggests that if we implement a complete REST >> API for IPA it would live here. Is the API supposed to be >> future-compatible? (The API itself seems to be a good subset of a >> complete REST API, but can we easily add an frontend with >> authentication, i18n, etc. here later, and keep the limitations for >> unauthenticated access?) >> Perhaps /ipa/smartproxy would be a better choice? > > It was future-proofing. I'm fine with changing the URI, it is probably a good > thing to save that name.
+1 for moving to /ipa/smartproxy/rest, we will want a complete REST interface in ipa/rest/ in the future. I rather opened a ticket to track that: https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4168 Martin _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
