On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 09:19 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 14:33 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> > >>>>>There is definitely a bug (or more) in ipa-pwd-extop in handling
> > >>>>>authentication cases.
> > >>>>Some progress on this investigation.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Plugin precedence setting is broken in 389-ds. It is only set once,
> > >>>>before running init function provided by the plugin and does not take
> > >>>>into account all callbacks that the init function may register. As
> > >>>>result, all these functions get classified with default precedence (50)
> > >>>>and no configuration could change this, we get ipa-pwd-extop's pre-bind
> > >>>>callback called before schemacompat's one, thus working on the compat
> > >>>>entry DN instead of the new one. Since that entry has no userPassword
> > >>>>attribute, OTP code refuses to accept any password.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>When user is allowed to use password auth along with OTP, the fact that
> > >>>>there is no userPassword get ipa-pwd-extop plugin through the failure.
> > >>>>schemacompat plugin rewrites the SLAPI_BIND_TARGET_SDN and the rest of
> > >>>>389-ds code checks actual password.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>So we have two issues here: OTP code needs to gracefully ignore entries
> > >>>>without userPassword set, and we need to be able to re-arrange
> > >>>>schemacompat and ipa-pwd-extop precedence for pre-bind operation.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I've filed a ticket https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47699 to work on
> > >>>>the latter.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>The messages from the log are not yet solved...
> > >>>Finally, I have a clue after tracing with debug level 1:
> > >>>[19/Feb/2014:22:57:10 +0200] - Calling plugin 'ipa-otp-lasttoken' #3 
> > >>>type 461
> > >>>[19/Feb/2014:22:57:10 +0200] - slapi_search_internal_set_pb: NULL 
> > >>>parameter
> > >>>[19/Feb/2014:22:57:10 +0200] - allow_operation: component identity is 
> > >>>NULL
> > >>>[19/Feb/2014:22:57:10 +0200] - Calling plugin 'IPA pwd pre ops betxn' #4 
> > >>>type 461
> > >>>
> > >>>So I'd say it is somewhere in ipa-otp-lasttoken. I'll dig more.
> > >>There is an error in libotp's find() function which assumes that
> > >>get_basedn() always returns non-NULL value. This is not true for at
> > >>least cn=Directory Manager.
> > >>
> > >>Patch attached.
> > >More fixes required, now that Thierry produced the fix for 389-ds ticket
> > >47699 which allows to re-arrange schema-compat and ipa-pwd-extop
> > >plugins. I'm getting crash in find() in libotp.c for internal search in
> > >some other conditions but at least user dn now is the correct one.
> > >
> > >Stay tuned.
> > OK, finally I've got it working -- my last patch had error which could
> > be attributed to the late night time.
> > 
> > New patch is attached to fix libotp to work properly with empty base dn
> > (such as cn=Directory Manager).
> > 
> > Also I'm attaching the patch that sets precedence of schema-compat
> > plugin to 49 (less than default 50). With this patch and 389-ds with
> > patch from ticket 47699 compat tree binds work with OTP.
> > 
> > When updated 389-ds-base will be released, we'll need to add Requires:
> > to our RPM spec to depend on it. Without the updated 389-ds-base compat
> > tree binds will not work with OTP but the rest will be working fine.
> > 
> > Finally, ACK to all OTP patches.
> 
> ACK to both of these patches.

I've merged the first patch here --
https://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2014-February/msg00341.html

I just realized the second patch shouldn't be ACK'd until we have a new
389DS release with the fix. When that happens, reissue this patch with
an update versioned require.

Nathaniel

_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel

Reply via email to