On 03/13/2014 04:40 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
Hello list,
FYI I have come across following RFC drafts:
(please start with the first one :-)
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bannister-dbis-mapping-03.txt
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bannister-dbis-passwd-02
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bannister-dbis-policy-03.txt
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bannister-dbis-netgroup-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bannister-dbis-automounter-02
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bannister-dbis-hosts-04
This is a bad idea to have hosts in LDAP. We already discussed it couple
years ago.
I didn't study them in detail but it seems like an attempt to
standardize Directory User Agent (DUA) profiles for various things
like automounter etc.
Maybe we can contact the author and coordinate/harmonize what possible.
+1
At first glance automount spec seems incompatible with RFC2307bis
schema, maybe that is one of things we can discuss and try to solve.
--
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal
Sr. Engineering Manager for IdM portfolio
Red Hat Inc.
-------------------------------
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
_______________________________________________
Freeipa-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
