On 04/03/2014 04:31 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On Wed, 02 Apr 2014, Martin Kosek wrote: >> On 04/01/2014 12:03 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 10:05:39AM +0200, Tomas Babej wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, that was the intention. Mistake on my part, I'll send updated >>>>> patches. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Updated patch attached. >>> >>> Ack based on reading the code and documentation for >>> slapi_ch_free_string. >>> >> >> Ok, thanks. Though I would like this patch to be also functionally tested >> that >> it does not break anything, ideally together with your other ipa-range >> patches. > ACK to 0162, 0161, 0158 (should be applied in this order). > > # ipa idrange-find > ---------------- > 2 ranges matched > ---------------- > Range name: AD.TEST_id_range > First Posix ID of the range: 1115000000 > Number of IDs in the range: 200000 > First RID of the corresponding RID range: 0 > Domain SID of the trusted domain: S-1-5-21-2275361654-3393353068-3720134936 > Range type: Active Directory domain range > > Range name: T.VDA.LI_id_range > First Posix ID of the range: 917400000 > Number of IDs in the range: 200000 > First RID of the corresponding RID range: 1000 > First RID of the secondary RID range: 100000000 > Range type: local domain range > ---------------------------- > Number of entries returned 2 > ---------------------------- > # ipa idrange-add AD.TEST_1_id_range > First Posix ID of the range: 1119000000 > Number of IDs in the range: 200000 > First RID of the corresponding RID range: 0 > First RID of the secondary RID range: 1000000 > ipa: ERROR: Constraint violation: New primary rid range overlaps with existing > primary rid range. > > the message comes from the ipa-range-check plugin. > >
Pushed all 3 to master. Martin _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
