My point was - we do not need Java for IPA package build (or do we?), we need rhino. Shouldn't then java be a dependency of rhino instead of freeipa package?
On 09/09/2014 01:52 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote: > On 5.9.2014 12:35, Martin Kosek wrote: >> Petr, why do we require java-1.7.0-openjdk in BuildRequires anyway? Shouldn't >> rhino be enough? > > I don't think that rhino pulls Java. The correct patch would be the one which > we already used upstream: > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2014-August/msg00111.html > > Basically replace java-1.7.0-openjdk with java-headless > >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: [freeipa] update to Java/8 >> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:41:13 +0000 (UTC) >> From: Pádraig Brady <pbr...@fedoraproject.org> >> To: freeipa-ow...@fedoraproject.org, scm-comm...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> commit c1d3c76c37530d0608f710f986be1614d2ed848b >> Author: Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com> >> Date: Tue Sep 2 18:40:05 2014 +0100 >> >> update to Java/8 >> >> Java/7 is no longer available in rawhide, >> so update to allow rebuilds to proceed. >> >> freeipa.spec | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> --- >> diff --git a/freeipa.spec b/freeipa.spec >> index f871260..2f8eac0 100644 >> --- a/freeipa.spec >> +++ b/freeipa.spec >> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ BuildRequires: m2crypto >> BuildRequires: check >> BuildRequires: libsss_idmap-devel >> BuildRequires: libsss_nss_idmap-devel >> -BuildRequires: java-1.7.0-openjdk >> +BuildRequires: java-1.8.0-openjdk >> BuildRequires: rhino >> BuildRequires: libverto-devel >> BuildRequires: systemd >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Freeipa-devel mailing list Freeipa-devel@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel