On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:31:32AM +0200, Tomas Babej wrote: > > a heavy process. Also, I wouldn't be strict about it, as we already have > a couple of workarounds, and not every time a workaround has a exact > mapping to a particular ticket.
Frankly, this worries me much more than not having ticket for some trivial change to the code base. If there's workaround in tests, it's some action that we do but users/admins don't in their real setups. And that can cause failures for our users that we don't see or even no longer know about because in our tests, we've cleverly worked around them. Either that workaround step is needed and needs to be documented, or that step should not be needed and there should be a ticket describing the issue. -- Jan Pazdziora Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code
