On (09/03/16 15:22), Jan Pazdziora wrote: >On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 02:57:07PM +0100, Petr Vobornik wrote: >> >> I didn't realize that pvoborni/freeipa is still used by somebody and not a >> personal testing repo - it was created at a time when @freeipa group didn't >> exist. >> >> For testing, please use >> @freeipa/freeipa-4-3 for stable 4.3 release > >Thank you, that works. The only minor drawback is that >pvoborni/freeipa-4-3 used to be announced as official repo while this >one says > > This *will* be the official COPR repository > >suggesting it is not yet considered official. > >> In a near future >> @freeipa/freeipa-4-3-centos7 will contain CentOS build of 4.3 > >Should I cast some preference, it'd be nice to have the CentOS builds >in @freeipa/freeipa-4-3 as well. The copr repo can have multiple >releases (there already are Fedora 23, 24, and rawhide) and adding >CentOS there instead to separate location could increase visibility >and decrease confusion. > Yes, it can have multiple release but freeipa-4.3 requires many dependencies which are not in CentOS 7 I would prefer if these dependencies were not in @freeipa/freeipa-4-3 but in separate copr repos which can be maintained by domain experts. e.g. we have our sssd repo https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/sssd/sssd-1-13/
And it's simpler to describe details of externla repo on front page of @freeipa/freeipa-4-3-centos7 LS -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code