On 2/1/2018 3:30 AM, Jakub Hrozek via FreeIPA-users wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 04:07:46PM -0500, TomK via FreeIPA-users wrote:
On 1/31/2018 2:34 PM, Jakub Hrozek via FreeIPA-users wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 01:18:27PM -0500, TomK via FreeIPA-users wrote:
On 1/31/2018 12:21 PM, TomK wrote:
On 1/31/2018 9:41 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
See inline..

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 03:23:57AM -0500, TomK wrote:
On 1/31/2018 3:18 AM, TomK via FreeIPA-users wrote:
My bad, did not include sssd-users earlier.  :(

Hey All,

I'm wondering if anyone came across this error below.  We have two RHEL
7.4 servers with SSSD 1.15.2: http-srv01 and http-srv02

Both connect to the same AD DC host below: addc-srv03.addom.com.
Verified krb5.conf and sssd.conf both are identical.  We can login on
the http-srv01 and can list all groups for an AD account.

On http-srv02 we cannot login and any group listing from the CLI result
only in the user's local groups.  No AD groups.

Logs give us the output below.  Short of adding in the entire log which
I might not be able to do till the end of the week, what could we look
at to resolve this?

There's very little available online on this error.  The RH solution
doesn't make sense since the first host connects and
authenticates users
just fine so it's definitely GC enabled.



--
Cheers,
Tom K.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Living on earth is expensive, but it includes a free trip around
the sun.



samba-libs-4.6.2-12.el7_4.x86_64
samba-client-libs-4.6.2-12.el7_4.x86_64
sssd-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.x86_64
openldap-2.4.44-5.el7.x86_64
sssd-ldap-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.x86_64
sssd-common-pac-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.x86_64
samba-winbind-clients-4.6.2-12.el7_4.x86_64
samba-common-4.6.2-12.el7_4.noarch
sssd-client-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.x86_64
sssd-proxy-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.x86_64
samba-winbind-modules-4.6.2-12.el7_4.x86_64
python-sssdconfig-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.noarch
sssd-ipa-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.x86_64
samba-common-libs-4.6.2-12.el7_4.x86_64
sssd-krb5-common-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.x86_64
samba-winbind-4.6.2-12.el7_4.x86_64
sssd-krb5-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.x86_64
sssd-ad-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.x86_64
sssd-common-1.15.2-50.el7_4.6.x86_64
samba-common-tools-4.6.2-12.el7_4.x86_64


(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sbus_dispatch]
(0x4000): dbus
conn: 0x55b2e22e8700
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sbus_dispatch] (0x4000):
Dispatching.
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sbus_message_handler]
(0x2000): Received SBUS method
org.freedesktop.sssd.dataprovider.getAccountInfo on path
/org/freedesktop/sssd/dataprovider
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sbus_get_sender_id_send]
(0x2000): Not a sysbus message, quit
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]]
[dp_get_account_info_handler]
(0x0200): Got request for
[0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=unix-admin-group@addom]
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [dp_attach_req]
(0x0400): DP
Request [Account #4]: New request. Flags [0x0001].
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [dp_attach_req] (0x0400):
Number of active DP request: 1
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sss_domain_get_state]
(0x1000): Domain ADDOM is Active
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sss_domain_get_state]
(0x1000): Domain ADDOM is Active
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sdap_id_op_connect_step]
(0x4000): beginning to connect
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [fo_resolve_service_send]
(0x0100): Trying to resolve service 'AD_GC'
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [get_server_status]
(0x1000):
Status of server 'addc-srv03.addom.com' is 'working'
(Tue Jan 30 19:00:01 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [get_port_status] (0x1000):
Port status of port 0 for server 'addc-srv03.addom.com' is 'not working'

What debug level are you running with? Is this the first occurence of
'port not working' since sssd started?
It's debug_level = 9.  There was 1002 occurrances since I restarted sssd
last night.  If it's F/W, I'm not clear on the port this is referring
too.
Also confirmed that port 3268 from both clients to the AD DC is blocked in
F/W. However then that raises the question why authentication works on
http-srv01 even though traffic to port 3268 is also getting denied from that
host.

The 'port' here refers to an internal sssd structure that usually maps
to a network port, but not always.

Is there some more context around the very first 'not working' since the
sssd restart? Because here is not much, there's just connecting and then
not working which leaves me puzzled.

The very first state switch should have a message from
"_be_fo_set_port_status" which also includes who was the caller etc.
That should give some more context.
_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Below is the snippet.

(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [ldb] (0x4000): Destroying
timer event 0x55d9c6aa2020 "ltdb_timeout"

(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [ldb] (0x4000): Ending timer
event 0x55d9c6ab2370 "ltdb_callback"

(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [check_if_pac_is_available]
(0x4000): No PAC available.
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sdap_id_op_connect_step]
(0x4000): beginning to connect
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [fo_resolve_service_send]
(0x0100): Trying to resolve service 'AD_GC'
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [get_server_status] (0x1000):
Status of server 'addc-srv01.addom.com' is 'working'
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [get_port_status] (0x1000):
Port status of port 0 for server 'addc-srv01.addom.com' is 'neutral'
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]]
[fo_resolve_service_activate_timeout] (0x2000): Resolve timeout set to 6
seconds
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [get_server_status] (0x1000):
Status of server 'addc-srv01.addom.com' is 'working'
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [be_resolve_server_process]
(0x1000): Saving the first resolved server
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [be_resolve_server_process]
(0x0200): Found address for server addc-srv01.addom.com: [49.4.165.26]

TTL 2010
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [ad_resolve_callback] (0x0100):
Constructed uri 'ldap://addc-srv01.addom.com'
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [ad_resolve_callback] (0x0100):
Constructed GC uri 'ldap://addc-srv01.addom.com:3268'
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sssd_async_socket_init_send]
(0x4000): Using file descriptor [25] for the connection.
(Wed Jan 31 13:28:09 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sssd_async_socket_init_send]
(0x0400): Setting 6 seconds timeout for connecting

Note the 6 seconds delay here..

(Wed Jan 31 13:28:15 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sssd_async_connect_timeout]
(0x0100): The connection timed out

..after which SSSD gives up..

(Wed Jan 31 13:28:15 2018) [sssd[be[ADDOM]]] [sssd_async_socket_init_done]
(0x0020): sdap_async_sys_connect request failed: [110]: Connection

OK, this seems to be the failure. Have you tried running a search from
the command line? Even a search for the rootDSE shoudl work well here:

     ldapsearch -x -H ldap://addc-srv01.addom.com:3268 -s base -b ""
_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Will send some details privately. Quite a long story but managed to get logins working without opening port 3268. Also was aware from the messages in the log files that port 3268 was closed as confirmed by our F/W team as well yet despite that, logins worked on the first host where port 3268 was also blocked.

--
Cheers,
Tom K.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Living on earth is expensive, but it includes a free trip around the sun.
_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to