Hi again, just a gentle bump to keep this visible, any advice on it or additional info I can provide?
On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 19:29, David Harvey <davidchar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Dear list, > > I noted from TFM > <https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/10/html/administration_guide/managing_replication-solving_common_replication_conflicts> > that conflicting values have ldapSubEntry and nsds5ReplConflict attributes, > however it only mentioned removing the latter. Should we in fact remove > ldapsubentry as well when resolving these conflicts? > > For the two conflicts I had, I noted: > 1. cn: ipservices was identical apart from the aforementioned attributes. > *laregly resolved but ldapsubentry still in place taking the newer version > over old > > 2. I had a subtly different "cn: System: Read POSIX details of SMB > services". Conflicting entries (ipaPermDefaultAttr: uid vs > ipaPermDefaultAttr: uidnumber) which I assume to be a schema change during > upgrade that borked somehow? > * I haven't actioned this one yet given the discrepancy. > > Recently upgraded packages in centos which took us from 4.7.6 (IIRC) to > 4.8.4. > > Thanks as ever, > > David >
_______________________________________________ FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
