On Sat, 2024-04-13 at 17:06 +0100, Sam Morris via FreeIPA-users wrote:
> I've got two RHEL 8 servers where named-pkcs11 aborts with an assertion
> failure after upgrading bind to version 32:9.11.36-11.el8_9.1.
> 
> ```
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: zone localhost/IN: loaded serial
> 0  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: zone localhost.localdomain/IN:
> loaded serial 0  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: zone 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa/IN:
> loaded serial 0  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: zone
> 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arp
> a/IN: loaded serial 0  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: all zones loaded  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: running  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: ../../../lib/dns-
> pkcs11/name.c:1116: REQUIRE((target != ((void *)0) &&
> (__builtin_expect(((target) != ((void *)0)), 1) && __builtin_ex>  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 systemd[1]: named-pkcs11.service: New main PID 372364
> does not belong to service, and PID file is not owned by root.
> Refusing.  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #0 0x563c05be4d14 in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 systemd[1]: named-pkcs11.service: New main PID 372364
> does not belong to service, and PID file is not owned by root.
> Refusing.  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #1 0x7fb179f28fe0 in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #2 0x7fb17a23b7b2 in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #3 0x7fb1687e4156 in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #4 0x7fb1687e45e1 in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #5 0x7fb1687e5e60 in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #6 0x7fb1687e6214 in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #7 0x7fb1687ef3e0 in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #8 0x7fb179f50904 in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #9 0x7fb179f5158f in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #10 0x7fb17733e1ca in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: #11 0x7fb176c42e73 in ??  
> Apr 13 15:54:50 named-pkcs11[372364]: exiting (due to assertion
> failure)
> ```
> 
> Downgrading to 9.11.36-11.el8_9.x86_64 fixes the problem.
> 
I had the same yesterday, so I rolled back the VMs to before the  last
update. When I tried again today I had no problems anymore. I guess due
to the fact that the update installed an updated bind-dyndb-ldap. This
has the following in the changelog:
* Thu Mar 28 2024 Rafael Jeffman <rjeff...@redhat.com> - 11.6-5
- Rebuild due to Bind ABI changes (CVE 2023-50387).
  Resolves: RHEL-28847

BR, Louis

--
_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to