On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:25:50PM -0500, Michael Rainey (Contractor) wrote: > Hi Sumit, > > I've trying to download the rpm via the Koji client and have been unable to > locate package. Are there any extra steps I need to complete before I can > find the package, such as, create an account in Fedora Build System. > Performing a general search for SSSD only returns a list of packages from > Fedora Projects and nothing from the EL repo.
The link I sent is the meta link for the different supported platforms (x86_64, pcc64 and pcc64le). If you select the link for x86_64 you should be able to see download links for the x86_64 packages. Nevertheless I created a new build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13446490 to fix some issue with the package version number in the previous build. The x86_64 packages can be found at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13446491 . To make the download easy you can try the following command: curl http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13446491 | grep -o '"https://.*.rpm"' | xargs -n 1 curl -L -O HTH bye, Sumit > > Thanks, > > *Michael Rainey* > NRL 7320 > Computer Support Group > Building 1009, Room C156 > Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 > On 03/22/2016 07:25 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > >On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:53:08AM -0500, Michael Rainey (Contractor) wrote: > >>Hi Sumit, > >> > >>It has been a week and I am following up with you on the lock screen issue. > >>Have you had any progress? If so, I am hoping implementing the fix will be > >>quick and easy. > >Thank you for your patience. Please find a test build for RHEL/CentOS > >7.2 at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13412048 . > > > >Besides the updated version of SSSD you should replace > >/etc/pam.d/smartcard-auth with > > > >======== /etc/pam.d/smartcard-auth ========= > >auth required pam_env.so > >auth sufficient pam_sss.so allow_missing_name > >auth required pam_deny.so > > > >account required pam_unix.so > >account sufficient pam_localuser.so > >account sufficient pam_succeed_if.so uid < 1000 quiet > >account [default=bad success=ok user_unknown=ignore] pam_sss.so > >account required pam_permit.so > > > > > >session optional pam_keyinit.so revoke > >session required pam_limits.so > >-session optional pam_systemd.so > >session [success=1 default=ignore] pam_succeed_if.so service in crond > >quiet use_uid > >session required pam_unix.so > >session optional pam_sss.so > >=========================================== > > > >and /etc/dconf/db/distro.d/10-authconfig > > > >===== /etc/dconf/db/distro.d/10-authconfig ===== > >[org/gnome/login-screen] > >enable-fingerprint-authentication=false > > > >[org/gnome/settings-daemon/peripherals/smartcard] > >removal-action='lock-screen' > >=============================================== > > > >and /etc/dconf/db/distro.d/locks/10-authconfig-locks > > > >====== /etc/dconf/db/distro.d/locks/10-authconfig-locks === > >/org/gnome/login-screen/enable-fingerprint-authentication > >/org/gnome/settings-daemon/peripherals/smartcard > >=========================================================== > > > >and call 'dconf update' to get the new setting loaded. Finally it might > >be a good idea to restart gdm to make sure the new setting and PAM > >configuration is really active although I would expect that gdm is able > >to pick up the changes at run-time. > > > >Any feedback, good or bad, is welcome. > > > >bye, > >Sumit > > > >>Thanks, > >> > >>*Michael Rainey* > >> > >>On 03/11/2016 02:32 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > >>>On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 01:36:15PM -0600, Michael Rainey (Contractor) > >>>wrote: > >>>>Greetings, > >>>> > >>>>I have been adding systems to my new domain and utilizing the smart card > >>>>login feature. To date the smart card login feature is working very well. > >>>>However, my group has been trying to implement locking the screen when the > >>>>smart card is removed, but have not been successful at making it work. > >>>>Does > >>>>anyone have any suggestions as to what it would take to enable locking the > >>>>screen when the smart card is removed. > >>>This requires a better integration with gdm which is currently WIP > >>>(https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2941). If you don't mind please > >>>ping me in about a week about this again, then I might have done some > >>>more testing. > >>> > >>>bye, > >>>Sumit > >>> > >>>>Thank you in advance. > >>>>-- > >>>>*Michael Rainey* > >>>>-- > >>>>Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: > >>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users > >>>>Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project > >>-- > >>Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: > >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users > >>Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project > -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project