On (13/09/16 10:39), Sumit Bose wrote: >On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:13:12AM +0200, Rob Verduijn wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks that did it. >> >> Is there a less painfull way to be notified of these changes ? >> >> My nfs configuration gets broken much more than I like because of changes >> like these. >> I know fedora is supposed to be testing grounds unstable software, but I >> would really like to hear a heads up more often. > >The change was mentioned in the upstream release notes of SSSD-1.14.1 >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Releases/Notes-1.14.1 but of course I >cannot be expected to read all upstream release note before running 'dnf >update'. > >The change was necessary because before the plugin was in the >sssd-common package and this caused that some nfs dependencies were >pulled in even on systems where nfs is not needed at all. Since neither >SSSD nor nfs-idmap strictly require the plugin the new package is not >automatically installed during update. >
Sorry for troubles. We can add weak dependency info sssd-common on sssd-nfs-idmap and it might be installed by default. IIRC dnf does not inform about suggested packages; but recommends minght work. Feel free ot file a BZ. The reason why it is in separate package is "container world". You need to have install packge sssd-nfs-idmap on host but sssd can be running in container. LS -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project
