On 23/02/17 20:27, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 23.02.2017 10:21, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> And as you noticed, packaging nss-pem is not a trivial task because of
>> the way it uses private NSS api's that the libnss maintainer refuses to
>> make public.. OpenSSL, anyone? :P
>>
> We are working on it :) in future IPA may need only openssl

Doesn't this open the GPL/OpenSSL licensing can of worms (for distro !=
Fedora)?

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project

Reply via email to