On 23/02/17 20:27, Martin Basti wrote: > On 23.02.2017 10:21, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >> And as you noticed, packaging nss-pem is not a trivial task because of >> the way it uses private NSS api's that the libnss maintainer refuses to >> make public.. OpenSSL, anyone? :P >> > We are working on it :) in future IPA may need only openssl
Doesn't this open the GPL/OpenSSL licensing can of worms (for distro != Fedora)? -- Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-users mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users Go to http://freeipa.org for more info on the project