Hey Peter, On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 20:56 -0800, Peter Selby wrote: > Hi Al, > > Huh, weird... > > Now I get this: > > $ ./bmc-config --commit --filename=/tmp/bmc.config > --section=Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege > fiid_obj_get: 'maximum_privilege_for_cipher_suite_5': data not available > > I tried checking out a config, but got: > > $ ./bmc-config checkout > ... > ... > Section Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege > fiid_obj_get: 'maximum_privilege_for_cipher_suite_5': data not available > > Don't know where that #5 came from, it was never mentioned before...
Doh! I screwed up my previous patch. Here's the newest beta. http://download.gluster.com/pub/freeipmi/qa-release/freeipmi-0.8.12.beta4.tar.gz > Sorry, this has got to be frustrating, I get the impression this BIOS > is horribly buggy? Most of the issues I've been dealing with in beta1-4 are actually bugs in my workaround code. It's just a little hard to deal with because of a lot of subtleties in this area and your particular issue. Thanks for taking the time to iterate. I *hope* it can fix your problem, but we still don't quite know. Al > Thanks, > > Peter > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Al Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > Ok, try #4 :P > > > > http://BLOCKEDdownload.gluster.com/pub/freeipmi/qa-release/freeipmi-0.8.12.beta3.tar.gz > > > > I think it was assuming you had to input ALL cipher suite ids, instead > > of just the ones that were supported on your motherboard. Hopefully > > it'll work, but there's still the potential there's an additional IPMI > > problem on the motherboard when we do the actual write (thus far, the > > bugs have been setting things up for the write). > > > > Al > > > > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 15:16 -0800, Peter Selby wrote: > >> Hi Al, > >> > >> Still getting the same problem: > >> > >> $ ./bmc-config --commit --filename=/tmp/bmc.config > >> --section="Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege" > >> ERROR: Failed to commit `Lan_Conf:MAC_Address': Read Only Field > >> ERROR: 'Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege:Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_4' > >> Field Required > >> ERROR: Failed to commit > >> `Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege:Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_0' > >> ERROR: 'Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege:Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_4' > >> Field Required > >> ERROR: Failed to commit > >> `Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege:Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_1' > >> ERROR: 'Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege:Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_4' > >> Field Required > >> ERROR: Failed to commit > >> `Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege:Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_2' > >> ERROR: 'Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege:Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_4' > >> Field Required > >> ERROR: Failed to commit > >> `Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege:Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_3' > >> > >> The config looks like: > >> > >> Section Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege > >> ## Possible values: > >> Unused/User/Operator/Administrator/OEM_Proprietary > >> Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_0 OEM_Proprietary > >> ## Possible values: > >> Unused/User/Operator/Administrator/OEM_Proprietary > >> Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_1 OEM_Proprietary > >> ## Possible values: > >> Unused/User/Operator/Administrator/OEM_Proprietary > >> Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_2 Administrator > >> ## Possible values: > >> Unused/User/Operator/Administrator/OEM_Proprietary > >> Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_3 Administrator > >> EndSection > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Al Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> wrote: > >> > Hey Peter, > >> > > >> > I put up a new release that hopefully outputs better/right error > >> > messages. > >> > > >> > http://BLOCKEDdownload.gluster.com/pub/freeipmi/qa-release/freeipmi-0.8.12.beta2.tar.gz > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Al > >> > > >> > On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 14:15 -0800, Al Chu wrote: > >> >> Hey Peter, > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 14:05 -0800, Peter Selby wrote: > >> >> > That works! > >> >> > > >> >> > Checking out the config, I get: > >> >> > > >> >> > Section Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege > >> >> > ## Possible values: > >> >> > Unused/User/Operator/Administrator/OEM_Proprietary > >> >> > Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_0 OEM_Proprietary > >> >> > ## Possible values: > >> >> > Unused/User/Operator/Administrator/OEM_Proprietary > >> >> > Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_1 OEM_Proprietary > >> >> > ## Possible values: > >> >> > Unused/User/Operator/Administrator/OEM_Proprietary > >> >> > ## Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_2 > >> >> > ## Possible values: > >> >> > Unused/User/Operator/Administrator/OEM_Proprietary > >> >> > ## Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_3 > >> >> > EndSection > >> >> > >> >> This is good, exactly what I hoped would happen. > >> >> > >> >> > When committing, any uncommented line gives: > >> >> > > >> >> > ERROR: Failed to commit > >> >> > `Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege:Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_0': Field > >> >> > Required > >> >> > > >> >> > ...Regardless of setting. Is that an error, or is the field just > >> >> > read-only? > >> >> > >> >> Doh! I need to fix the error message text, but the basic behavior is > >> >> correct. The other two fields: > >> >> > >> >> Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_2 > >> >> and > >> >> Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_2 > >> >> > >> >> need to be populated with a value (and the line uncommented). Hopefully > >> >> that will be enough to get around the HP problem (if there's a further > >> >> HP mobo problem, we'll have to deal with it when we find it). > >> >> > >> >> Al > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks again! > >> >> > > >> >> > Peter > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Al Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> wrote: > >> >> > > Hi Peter, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > http://BLOCKEDdownload.gluster.com/pub/freeipmi/qa-release/freeipmi-0.8.12.beta1.tar.gz > >> >> > > > >> >> > > I realized the workaround in beta0 fixed the --checkout part for > >> >> > > this > >> >> > > issue on your motherboard, but I had a bug in the --commit portion > >> >> > > of > >> >> > > the workaround. Could you check out the above instead? Thanks. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Al > >> >> > > > >> >> > > On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:23 -0800, Al Chu wrote: > >> >> > >> Hi Peter, > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> I believe I have something that should workaround your problem, > >> >> > >> can you > >> >> > >> try out this test tar.gz to see? Without a motherboard to try > >> >> > >> this on, > >> >> > >> I don't know if it works for sure, but I'm confident it will. The > >> >> > >> tar.gz is here; > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> http://BLOCKEDdownload.gluster.com/pub/freeipmi/qa-release/freeipmi-0.8.12.beta0.tar.gz > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> It is quite newer than what you were running before, hope that's > >> >> > >> ok. > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> Normal ./configure ; make ; make install to install, or you can run > >> >> > >> bmc-config out of the local build bmc-config/src/. > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> If it doesn't work, please send the --debug output like before. > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, > >> >> > >> Al > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 21:34 -0800, Peter Selby wrote: > >> >> > >> > Thanks! Let me know if you need any more info... > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Al Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> wrote: > >> >> > >> > > Hi Peter, > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > It's as I suspected: > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get LAN Configuration Parameters Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = present_revision[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = oldest_revision_parameter[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 4h] = cipher_suite_entry_count[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > This says there are 4 cipher suites to read. > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get LAN Configuration Parameters Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = present_revision[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = oldest_revision_parameter[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = cipher_suite_id_entry_A[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = cipher_suite_id_entry_B[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cipher_suite_id_entry_C[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 3h] = cipher_suite_id_entry_D[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > This shows which ones are supported, and it properly shows 4 > >> >> > >> > > of them. > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get LAN Configuration Parameters Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = present_revision[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = oldest_revision_parameter[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 55h] = reserved[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 5h] = maximum_privilege_for_cipher_suite_1[ > >> >> > >> > >> 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 5h] = maximum_privilege_for_cipher_suite_2[ > >> >> > >> > >> 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> fiid_obj_get: maximum_privilege_for_cipher_suite_3: no data > >> >> > >> > >> set > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > This is supposed to tell us what the maximum privilege level > >> >> > >> > > for those 4 > >> >> > >> > > cipher suites are, but the command only returns 2. Uh oh ... > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > I'll need to think about how to work around this. Maybe if > >> >> > >> > > this > >> >> > >> > > happens, I could have bmc-config output "Unknown" or > >> >> > >> > > something, and it's > >> >> > >> > > up to the user to force the configuration of something. Let > >> >> > >> > > me think > >> >> > >> > > about this and get back to you with a patch ... > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > Al > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 16:00 -0800, Peter Selby wrote: > >> >> > >> > >> Thanks for the quick response! > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> ipmiping doesn't work, either from the host or from a > >> >> > >> > >> neighbour. I'm > >> >> > >> > >> pretty sure it's not a network issue, but I'll double-check, > >> >> > >> > >> and try a > >> >> > >> > >> hard-reset. > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> Here's the output of debug: > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> bmc-config --checkout --section=Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege > >> >> > >> > >> --debug > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get Device ID Request > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get Device ID Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = device_id[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 3h] = device_revision.revision[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = device_revision.reserved1[ 3b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = device_revision.sdr_support[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = firmware_revision1.major_revision[ 7b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = firmware_revision1.device_available[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 22h] = firmware_revision2.minor_revision[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = ipmi_version_major[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = ipmi_version_minor[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = > >> >> > >> > >> additional_device_support.sensor_device[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = > >> >> > >> > >> additional_device_support.sdr_repository_device[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = additional_device_support.sel_device[ > >> >> > >> > >> 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = > >> >> > >> > >> additional_device_support.fru_inventory_device[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = > >> >> > >> > >> additional_device_support.ipmb_event_receiver[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = > >> >> > >> > >> additional_device_support.ipmb_event_generator[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = additional_device_support.bridge[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = > >> >> > >> > >> additional_device_support.chassis_device[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ F85h] = manufacturer_id.id[20b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = manufacturer_id.reserved1[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = product_id[16b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get Channel Info Command Request > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 42h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = channel_number[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get Channel Info Command Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 42h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = actual_channel_number[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = actual_channel_number.reserved[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = channel_medium_type[ 7b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = channel_medium_type.reserved[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = channel_protocol_type[ 5b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = channel_protocol_type.reserved[ 3b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = active_session_count[ 6b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = session_support[ 2b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1BF2h] = vendor_id[24b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ FFFFh] = auxiliary_channel_info[16b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get Channel Info Command Request > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 42h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = channel_number[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get Channel Info Command Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 42h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ CCh] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = actual_channel_number[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = actual_channel_number.reserved[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = channel_medium_type[ 7b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = channel_medium_type.reserved[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = channel_protocol_type[ 5b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = channel_protocol_type.reserved[ 3b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = active_session_count[ 6b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = session_support[ 2b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1BF2h] = vendor_id[24b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ FFFFh] = auxiliary_channel_info[16b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get Channel Info Command Request > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 42h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = channel_number[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get Channel Info Command Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 42h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = actual_channel_number[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = actual_channel_number.reserved[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 4h] = channel_medium_type[ 7b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = channel_medium_type.reserved[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = channel_protocol_type[ 5b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = channel_protocol_type.reserved[ 3b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = active_session_count[ 6b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = session_support[ 2b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1BF2h] = vendor_id[24b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ FFFFh] = auxiliary_channel_info[16b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get User Access Command Request > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 44h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = channel_number[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved1[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = user_id[ 6b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved2[ 2b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get User Access Command Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 44h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 3h] = max_channel_user_ids[ 6b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved1[ 2b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = current_channel_user_ids[ 6b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = user_id_enable_status[ 2b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = current_channel_fixed_names[ 6b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved2[ 2b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = user_privilege_level_limit[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = user_ipmi_messaging[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = user_link_authentication[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = user_restricted_to_callback[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved3[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> # > >> >> > >> > >> # Section Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege Comments > >> >> > >> > >> # > >> >> > >> > >> # If your system supports IPMI 2.0 and Serial-over-LAN > >> >> > >> > >> (SOL),cipher suite IDs > >> >> > >> > >> # may be configurable below. In the Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege > >> >> > >> > >> section, maximum > >> >> > >> > >> # user privilege levels allowed for authentication under IPMI > >> >> > >> > >> 2.0 (including > >> >> > >> > >> # Serial-over-LAN) are set for each supported cipher suite > >> >> > >> > >> ID. Each > >> >> > >> > >> cipher suite > >> >> > >> > >> # ID supports different sets of authentication, integrity, > >> >> > >> > >> and encryption > >> >> > >> > >> # algorithms for IPMI 2.0. Typically, the highest privilege > >> >> > >> > >> level any username > >> >> > >> > >> # configured should set for support under a cipher suite ID. > >> >> > >> > >> This is typically > >> >> > >> > >> # "Administrator". > >> >> > >> > >> # > >> >> > >> > >> Section Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get LAN Configuration Parameters Request > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = channel_number[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved1[ 3b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = get_parameter[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 16h] = parameter_selector[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = set_selector[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = block_selector[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get LAN Configuration Parameters Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = present_revision[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = oldest_revision_parameter[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 4h] = cipher_suite_entry_count[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get LAN Configuration Parameters Request > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = channel_number[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved1[ 3b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = get_parameter[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 17h] = parameter_selector[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = set_selector[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = block_selector[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get LAN Configuration Parameters Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = present_revision[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = oldest_revision_parameter[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = cipher_suite_id_entry_A[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = cipher_suite_id_entry_B[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cipher_suite_id_entry_C[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 3h] = cipher_suite_id_entry_D[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get LAN Configuration Parameters Request > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = channel_number[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = reserved1[ 3b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = get_parameter[ 1b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 18h] = parameter_selector[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = set_selector[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = block_selector[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> Get LAN Configuration Parameters Response > >> >> > >> > >> ===================================================== > >> >> > >> > >> [ 2h] = cmd[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 0h] = comp_code[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = present_revision[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 1h] = oldest_revision_parameter[ 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 55h] = reserved[ 8b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 5h] = maximum_privilege_for_cipher_suite_1[ > >> >> > >> > >> 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> [ 5h] = maximum_privilege_for_cipher_suite_2[ > >> >> > >> > >> 4b] > >> >> > >> > >> fiid_obj_get: maximum_privilege_for_cipher_suite_3: no data > >> >> > >> > >> set > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Al Chu <ch...@llnl.gov> > >> >> > >> > >> wrote: > >> >> > >> > >> > Hi Peter, > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > Assuming you're using a recent version of FreeIPMI, there's > >> >> > >> > >> > probably > >> >> > >> > >> > some IPMI non-compliance going on on your motherboard. The > >> >> > >> > >> > short guess > >> >> > >> > >> > is that the motherboard isn't properly reporting things to > >> >> > >> > >> > bmc-config > >> >> > >> > >> > correctly, and bmc-config gets confused and gives up. > >> >> > >> > >> > There's been a > >> >> > >> > >> > few IPMI issues for the HP DL145 already reported to me. > >> >> > >> > >> > Lets see if we > >> >> > >> > >> > can figure out what's going on. Can you send me the > >> >> > >> > >> > --debug output. > >> >> > >> > >> > Since the problem appears just in that section, how about > >> >> > >> > >> > running this > >> >> > >> > >> > to shorten the output > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > bmc-config --checkout --section=Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege > >> >> > >> > >> > --debug > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> >> Any idea what could be wrong, or how to fix it? And could > >> >> > >> > >> >> this be the > >> >> > >> > >> >> reason the network won't come up? > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > Although it's always possible, it's unlikely this is the > >> >> > >> > >> > cause of IPMI > >> >> > >> > >> > over LAN not working. Can you get an ipmiping > >> >> > >> > >> > (/usr/sbin/ipmiping) to > >> >> > >> > >> > work? If yes that would point to it being an > >> >> > >> > >> > authentication problem > >> >> > >> > >> > (e.g. username/password/privilege, etc.), if no, possibly a > >> >> > >> > >> > more basic > >> >> > >> > >> > networking issue (subnetting, routing, etc.). > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > I haven't played with this motherboard specifically, but a > >> >> > >> > >> > few recent > >> >> > >> > >> > ones I've encountered require you to hard-reset (e.g. power > >> >> > >> > >> > button push) > >> >> > >> > >> > the motherboard for configuration changes to "stick". It > >> >> > >> > >> > certainly > >> >> > >> > >> > can't hurt to try. > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > Al > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 15:29 -0800, Peter Selby wrote: > >> >> > >> > >> >> Hi guys, > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> I'm trying to configure the BMC on an HP ProLiant DL145 G2 > >> >> > >> > >> >> using > >> >> > >> > >> >> bmc-config. IPMI over LAN is not working; it should have > >> >> > >> > >> >> a fixed IP, > >> >> > >> > >> >> but it won't respond to anything. > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> When I try to dump the BMC config, I get: > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> $ bmc-config --checkout > >> >> > >> > >> >> ... > >> >> > >> > >> >> Section Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege > >> >> > >> > >> >> fiid_obj_get: maximum_privilege_for_cipher_suite_3: no > >> >> > >> > >> >> data set > >> >> > >> > >> >> $ > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> Everything prior to that dumps okay. Adding the section > >> >> > >> > >> >> (and > >> >> > >> > >> >> subsequent SOL_Conf section) manually, I get two possible > >> >> > >> > >> >> results: > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> * Empty Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege: Config commits > >> >> > >> > >> >> successfully, but a > >> >> > >> > >> >> checkout results in the same problem > >> >> > >> > >> >> * Rmcpplus_Conf_Privilege filled in based on the > >> >> > >> > >> >> bmc-config.conf > >> >> > >> > >> >> manpage (with > >> >> > >> > >> >> Maximum_Privilege_Cipher_Suite_Id_0-through-4 or 12): I > >> >> > >> > >> >> get the same error, fiid_obj_get: > >> >> > >> > >> >> maximum_privilege_for_cipher_suite_3: no data set > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> Any idea what could be wrong, or how to fix it? And could > >> >> > >> > >> >> this be the > >> >> > >> > >> >> reason the network won't come up? > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> Peter > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> > >> > >> >> Freeipmi-devel mailing list > >> >> > >> > >> >> Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org > >> >> > >> > >> >> http://BLOCKEDBLOCKEDBLOCKEDBLOCKEDBLOCKEDBLOCKEDBLOCKEDlists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > -- > >> >> > >> > >> > Albert Chu > >> >> > >> > >> > ch...@llnl.gov > >> >> > >> > >> > Computer Scientist > >> >> > >> > >> > High Performance Systems Division > >> >> > >> > >> > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > > -- > >> >> > >> > > Albert Chu > >> >> > >> > > ch...@llnl.gov > >> >> > >> > > Computer Scientist > >> >> > >> > > High Performance Systems Division > >> >> > >> > > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> -- > >> >> > >> Albert Chu > >> >> > >> ch...@llnl.gov > >> >> > >> Computer Scientist > >> >> > >> High Performance Systems Division > >> >> > >> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> > >> Freeipmi-devel mailing list > >> >> > >> Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org > >> >> > >> http://BLOCKEDBLOCKEDBLOCKEDBLOCKEDlists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel > >> >> > >> > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > Albert Chu > >> >> > > ch...@llnl.gov > >> >> > > Computer Scientist > >> >> > > High Performance Systems Division > >> >> > > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > -- > >> > Albert Chu > >> > ch...@llnl.gov > >> > Computer Scientist > >> > High Performance Systems Division > >> > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- > > Albert Chu > > ch...@llnl.gov > > Computer Scientist > > High Performance Systems Division > > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory > > > > > -- Albert Chu ch...@llnl.gov Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel