Not TCP per say but I built a HTTP REST based proxy that brokers requests to freeipmi.
http://theforeman.org/manuals/1.8/index.html Its the smart-proxy component (BMC) Corey > On Jun 26, 2015, at 1:44 PM, dan farmer <z...@fish2.com> wrote: > > Hi folks - > > Has anyone out there ever seen or have you ever done anything with IPMI over > TCP? > > In the spec pretty much the only time they talk about TCP is in: > > 13.2 Required ASF/RMCP Messages for IPMI-over-LAN > > The following class=ASF messages under RMCP must be supported in a system > implementing the IPMI LAN interfaces over TCP/IP-UDP. > > […] > > ASF Presence Ping message REQUIRED. > > In scans I see lots of systems answering to TCP 623; nmap lists it as > “oob-ws-http”, but it appears to simply detect the openness of it, not that > it actually does something. > > I’d always meant to look into to this, and I could have sworn I had it > working awhile back, but I my recent efforts to put the UPD payload of both > Get Channel Authentication Capabilities and the ASF Ping and don't get a > valid response back (most often I see something like "00 00 00 02 09 00 00 00 > 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00”)… > > So does anyone know about any implementations out there? Is TCP 623 actually > used for IPMI, or for other OOB protos, or…? > > I don’t have any direct access to a system that uses TCP 623, so I don’t want > to beat on it too much without knowing more. > > Thanks for any RFTMs or whatever - > > dan > > _______________________________________________ > Freeipmi-devel mailing list > Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
_______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
