Hi Thomas, Seems reasonable. In fact, I think 4096 is a decent enough choice. We'll jump it to there. It'll be out in the next FreeIPMI release.
I'll give you credit in the ChangeLog. Al On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 12:52 +0000, Grohmann, Thomas wrote: > Hello, > > i have the problem getting “Too many sensors; limit is 1024 “ on > large systems of bull because of the restriction for > MAX_SENSOR_RECORD_IDS to 1024 sensors. > Please can you double the value to 2048 like in the patch below ? > > Regards > Thomas > > > Num sensors > BULL S2 > 185 > BULL S4 > 370 > BULL S8 > 740 > BULL S12 > 1110 > BULL S16 > 1480 > > # Old Mail for similar problem increasing value from 512 to 1024 for > BULL bullion S8 > https://www.mail-archive.com/freeipmi-devel@gnu.org/msg01788.html > https://www.mail-archive.com/freeipmi-devel@gnu.org/msg01793.html > > > diff -uNr freeipmi-1.5.2/common/toolcommon/tool-sensor-common.h > freeipmi-1.5.2p/common/toolcommon/tool-sensor-common.h > --- freeipmi-1.5.2/common/toolcommon/tool-sensor-common.h > 2016-01-08 02:05:27.000000000 +0100 > +++ freeipmi-1.5.2p/common/toolcommon/tool-sensor-common.h > 2016-07-27 16:19:05.603715523 +0200 > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ > #define MAX_SENSOR_TYPES 256 > #else /* !0 */ > /* achu: pick more reasonable limits than the theoretical maxes */ > -#define MAX_SENSOR_RECORD_IDS 1024 > +#define MAX_SENSOR_RECORD_IDS 2048 > #define MAX_SENSOR_TYPES 64 > #endif /* !0 */ > #endif /* !__CYGWIN__ */ > > _______________________________________________ > Freeipmi-devel mailing list > Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel -- Albert Chu ch...@llnl.gov Computer Scientist High Performance Systems Division Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory _______________________________________________ Freeipmi-devel mailing list Freeipmi-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel