On 8/31/06, Dave Baker <dbkr at freenetproject.org> wrote: > > I assume he means by doing that, you'll get messages directed to those > addresses. This was a massive part of the design consideration when > implementing KSK addresses, and the conclusion was that no - it shouldn't > happen, for the reason that routing in 0.7 is quite good, so anyone > sending a > mail to those addresses, when they look up the mailsite, their request > will > be routed to the correct location in the network (where the genuine > mailsite > is) rather than the spoofed one which is in an arbitrary place in the > network. > > This is why KSK addresses are only 'probably' secure. :) To thwart this > attack, just use your long, secure address.
sp the messages themselves are not encrypted? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/freemail/attachments/20060831/33f6586e/attachment.html>
