On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:50:04PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > This is certainly the most level-headed and reasonable post of the entire
> > discussion and I must certainly agree that there is no reason to believe
> > our claims without simulation and it is up to the proposes of a new system
> > to create the simultion results necessary to support their point.
>
> I would also be interested to hear your comments on how my "Shadow
> Node" proposal (as posted here yesterday) compares to your proposal.
The "shadowing" makes sense should the most important and scarce commodity
on the network be disk space, but I think it's more likely that the most
scarce commodity will be bandwidth, to which the "shadowed" nodes would
give no contribution.
But it's not a bad idea and since it is harmless when not used it may be
worth adding at some point.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ian.
--
'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
'Here,' Montag touched his head.
'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded.
Oskar Sandberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
