>From Travis Bemann <bemann@bemann>
>There has been lots of discussion on using stuff like mapfiles/MSKs to
>handle pseudoupdating. However, pseudoupdating is just a temporary
>measure that will be obsoleted by real updating. So why don't we not
>waste our time working on a temporary measure and instead actually try
>testing pass-through and selective-broadcast updates with Serapis and
>then actually implement the better of the two updating schemes?! If
>we did this right now we might be able to get real updating in Freenet
>0.4, but if we work on the temporary measure of mapfiles, real
>updating will probably not be in Freenet 0.4 and will wait to Freenet
>0.5.
>
>--
>Travis Bemann
Unless there are serious performance issues with the date-based redirect and
MSK combination, I do not see a reason to implement real* updating at all.
* I'm not entirely clear what the difference between "real" and "fake"
updating is, however.
--
Benjamin Coates
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
