Running Freenet on another protocol is certainly possible. See
Freenet.transports for the tcp code. The grunt work of protocol
abstraction has already been done.
Realize that its probably still a big job, though.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After following the recent heated debate over whether and
> how to protect node operator anonymity, I thought I'd
> suggest creating a new contrib/ project: a new transport
> layer that could be used by Freenet instead of tcp.
>
> I'm imagining something that would sit on top of tcp and
> could add additional layers of hiding (like Ian's shadow
> nodes or simply node clusters), or features like
> steganography. So, instead of tcp/1.2.3.4:1234 for
> a DataSource, you might see anon/<VARIOUS MAGIC NUMBERS>.
>
> Instead of branching Fred to add a lot of paranoia features,
> maybe these could all be handled in the new transport layer
> which could just be plugged into Fred. Plus, it could be
> used for stuff other than Freenet.
>
> Still a very undeveloped idea..
>
> -t.c.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
