>From Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >BC: >> I just want to mention that I don't think it's realistic to just forbid >> client-side code in Freenet; Far too many applications will need it, >> especially since the server-side code that makes many web things possible >> isn't available on Freenet, and we can't realistically add every concievable >> feature to the client like we did date-based redirects. > >Of course. But it's not forbidden. You can just optionally have a warning >system turned on. > "Forbid" was a poor choice of word. We need a method of using client-side code that does not compromise the anonymity or security of the user. -- Benjamin Coates _______________________________________________ Freenet-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector checked in Brandon
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector check... Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector c... Dev Random
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detect... Gianni Johansson
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detect... Ian Clarke
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security de... Dev Random
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector check... Dev Random
- RE: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector checked in Benjamin Coates
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector checked in Benjamin Coates
- RE: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector checked in Benjamin Coates
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector check... news
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector c... Dale Babiy
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detect... tavin
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security de... Dale Babiy
- Re: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security de... Scott Gregory Miller
- RE: [Freenet-dev] FProxy security detector checked in Duncan Irvine