On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 05:12:52AM -0600, Mark J. Roberts wrote:
> The date-based redirects are already in InsertClient, so it shouldn't be
> very hard to copy them. Quite a few options, but they all make sense. I
> don't like a the format of the key. For example,
> 
>       freenet:SSK@AwypMJH9hhiQWxwb0m6CygNe3~Cm6Y15/20001230000000-blah
> 
> could more intuitively be
> 
>       freenet:SSK@AwypMJH9hhiQWxwb0m6CygNe3~Cm6Y15/blah/20001230000000
> 
> or maybe
> 
>       freenet:SSK@AwypMJH9hhiQWxwb0m6CygNe3~Cm6Y15/20001230000000/blah

I didn't closely follow the argument over how to format the date part in
the url, but I think that format was chosen b/c it's the only one that
doesn't screw with the browser's notion of the directory structure or
the filename extension.

Couldn't we also handle that with something like:
freenet:SSK@AwypMJH9hhiQWxwb0m6CygNe3~Cm6Y15/blah.ext?timestamp=20001230000000

Browsers should understand this AFAIK, and it would also be a way to
add other info in the future as parameters, w/o overloading the basic url
format too much..

--

// Tavin Cole

_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev

Reply via email to