Oh, okay. My bad, bad.
On 31 Dec 2000, Mr.Bad wrote:
> >>>>> "SGM" == Scott Gregory Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> SGM> The second synchronizes the entire method. The internal
> SGM> synchronized block lets you lock a specific chunk of code.
> SGM> Better, you get to lock on a specific object, so you can
> SGM> control access to the object rather than the method.
>
> No, I understand that. What I was talking about was exactly what I
> wrote -- that the synchonized block uses the monitor belonging to
> "this", and that there's no code outside the block.
>
> ~Mr. Bad
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> /\____/\ Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> \ / Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/ | *Stay*Real*Bad*
> | (X \x)
> ( ((**) "If it's not bad, don't do it.
> \ <vvv> If it's not crazy, don't say it." - Ben Franklin
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freenet-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freenet-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freenet-dev
