"Ronald L. Chichester" wrote:

> Several lawyers have addressed the issue of GPL "infection."  The rule
> of thumb is: if you mix GPL source code with other code to make new
> binary executable, then that other source code is subject to the GPL.

It's even less restrictive than that. You can link GPL code to, say, the MFCs. What 
you can't do is proprietary
code to the GPL. Now... I'm not entirely clear on this distinction myself, but there's 
a certain directionality
to the licence. How this all relates to interpreted Python code, I really don't know.

IANAL!!

--
Oliver White

_______________________________________________
Freepm-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/freepm-discuss

Reply via email to