The whole point of Harmony seems to make KDE run on top of a free GUI library.
Your argument goes against the very basic purpose of Harmony, as I understand it.
>
> Ok, with Relay++, Harmony will not be 100% source compatible with
> legacy Qt apps, only, say, 99% (*)
>
> Perhaps your fear is that the KDE people will avoid using Harmony if it=
> is not source compatible with Qt? This is wrong. They will use what
> they feel is the most appropriate tool for the job. I even read
> somewhere that there was a Tk extension which adds KDE compatibility!
> If you can now write KDE apps with Tcl, you certainly will be able to
> do so with an enhanced replacement of Qt.
>
> In short, Harmony should not be a Qt clone, but a better Qt.
A better but non-compatible Qt. What's the point? It does not
help the needs of the community. A Free Qt clone is needed.
Just an observer.
--
Li-Cheng Tai (Andy Tai) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free software: the software by the people, of the people and for the people,
worldwide. Develop! Share! Enhance! And enjoy!
