On Thu, 25 Mar 1999, Carl Thompson wrote: > However, some members of the KDE team have said on the list recently that > KDE would not switch from QT even if a free compatible alternative existed. > To me, that is much more of a concern than Troll Tech. But I believe the KDE packager said that if Harmony worked it could be an alternative build target, worked into Makefiles etc.. So we have a start their. Personally I think that the freer toolkit will win, therefore I think that a highly functional Harmony will run over Qt, given a little momentum. L, Mark -- Mark Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mjm.net MarkX on IRC
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Karl Nelson
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Mark
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Jo Dillon
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival David Price
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival jedi
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Mark
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Richard Stallman
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Mark
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Jo Dillon
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Mark
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Mark
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Adam J. Richter
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Karl Nelson
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Adam J. Richter
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival - Norwegian Law Christian Schaller
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Adam J. Richter
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Richard Stallman
- [freeqt] Strategy? Matt Heck
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Adam J. Richter
- Re: [freeqt] Harmony Revival Richard Stallman