At 01:28 PM 9/5/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>At 11:20 AM 9/5/2001 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Hello all,
>>
>>I am curious if anyone has tested freeradius with a 128bit proxy attribute.
>> Our upstream proxy requires us to be able to take and respond to the radius
>>requests with a 128bit proxy-state attribute.
>>
>>Currently we are using Cistron 1.6.4 and this hasn't had any problems but I
>>thier techs have told me that any earlier versions of Cistron code was not
>>able to handle thier proxy-state attribute.
>
>I know that some older radius servers mangle the Proxy-State attribute
>in violation of the RFC ( *cough*MERIT*cough* ), but you should find that
>FreeRADIUS conforms to the RFC explicitly in returning the Proxy-State
>attribute unmolested.
>
>If Cistron 1.6.4 is safe, I very strongly suspect that FreeRADIUS will
>be safe as well.
>
>Of course, the only way to be 100% sure is to test it. Your upstream
>should be able to direct a test to a test installation on your network.
I have tested freeradius with the new Proxy-State that was introduced also
in Cistron 1.6.4. It works perfectly.
----------------------------------
Nathan Miller
Visp Systems Administration
Voice: 541-476-5352 ext. 4
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
